An interesting moment in transgressing my own boundaries between self and avatar. Rarely have we appeared together and here only in the name of science.
This video came about from a little research that was carried out in advance of an upcoming, 7th July, symposium that we will be presenting to a remote audience in Kuala Lumpar. We cannot be there physically so my question was, if we decide to use Second Life in what ways can we create maximum social presence?
I am an immersionist, that is I let StevenW build his own space inside SL, yet I am interested in ways to move information in and out of Second Life, punching holes through the membrane and linking in-world and out-of-world experiences. The porosity of SL has changed over time with channels opening for blogging; twitter, web-browsing, SL to Flickr, audio, facebook links, and streaming video. Taking the scenario of a face-2-face conference blended with SL participants I took a peek at the different ways to stream live video into SL. Inspired by posts from both AndyPowell and Rob Smart's blogs I set up a quick trial with Veodia, knowing their live video webstreaming service is now available for free and is offered in a format compatible with Second Life.
So how was it? Well simple, so simple I was left wondering what the catch was, bandwidth issues aside. Here is a quick run through of the steps I followed:
- Opened an account with Veodia, a straightforward exercise;
- Clicked through the screens to start my first broadcast;
- Pressed the appropriate button and let my Apple MacPro do the audio-video and capture;
- Previewed the stream to check I was on air and then copied the rtsp URL provided by Veodia from the live broadcast page;
- Launched Second Life;
- Made a coffee while I waited to get in-world ;)
- Knocked up a quick media screen, set the textures and then pasted the rtsp stream URL into the land parcel settings;
- Pressed the media player button in SL;
- Bingo, there I was alive and kicking in the virtual universe.
Whether we will use this for the symposium I am still unsure, my preference I think would be to have the audience streamed into SL so that we have some sense of those who are watching and listening in the conference room. Testing the set-up with fellow panelists uncovered three issues that are driving me away from using SL as a conferencing tool:
- First and most obvious is the heavy bandwidth requirements for this configuration and the related issue of delay, around 3-5 seconds, between the capture and delivery of the video stream;
- Second is the lack of status or feedback indicators, the kind of thing you find when using a tool like Elluminate where you can ask the audience questions and get feedback through a series of emoticons that includes useful items like the 'hands-up' attention grabber;
- Third follows a similar line and concerns the difficulty in providing a mechanism for live audience participation. Setting up a back channel would be an ideal solution and making use of the main SL chat window would be the natural place for this. Yet to my knowledge it is still impossible to remotely work with SL chat so delegates would need to log into SL if they wanted to use the chat window. The option of using a lightweight client such as AjaxLife might be a solution, if the audience all have SL accounts or deploying a non-integrated chat client bought in through the in-world media browser. Both options are still not ideal.
There is perhaps a fourth reason, intimated at the start of this post, the separation of avatar and typist. My avatar and me do not appear in public together, or least not very often and somehow that feels right. The quandry of where to post snapshots of us both together, Flickr seemed at first the obvious place, confirmed to me that despite the fuzzy boundary between real and virtual identities they remain in many aspects decoupled. SL is a different space and there exists a differentiated person which goes someway to explain my discomfort in completely collapsing our two identities.
Hi StevenW,
I was just wondering something. When I did a similar exercise recently (only a still, but similar in the sense of bringing my other form into SL) I also ended up making the fleshware appear larger than I am. I was wondering whether you did this deliberately, or whether there is some subtle psychology at work which makes our more material selves tend to represent themselves as larger?
Posted by: Suzetta | July 04, 2008 at 20:10
I've played briefly with this under Vista and was, like you, surprised at how easy it is to do. I was, however, under the impression that Veodia was free for 500 min or 3 months rather than indefinitely. Unless there's some educator or SL dispensation I missed? And, as Suzetta, said I made the prim larger than my avatar and the only other time I saw it done, it was the same.
Posted by: Graham Mills | July 05, 2008 at 01:46
hi Graham ... thanks for the clarification and yes you are right. The free sign up gives you the trial account which on mine allows for 500 minutes/views per month.
Posted by: Steven Warburton | July 05, 2008 at 03:49
Interesting comment about the size of selves and a hint at the subtle psychology or is that symbolism of dominance of the real-world selves ... such big egos :) Or perhaps the virtual is just a pet? There are some other interesting examples in the Flickr group 'Behind the avatar' here:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2053/1838772271_421a3fc3de.jpg?v=0
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2042/1665203707_dda0f9739e.jpg?v=0
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2244/1662743415_aea0d819ac.jpg?v=0
Posted by: StevenW | July 05, 2008 at 03:59
I was just wondering if you could have some further selves here with avatars from different worlds.
Posted by: Shirley Williams | July 16, 2008 at 02:25
Dr.Steven Warburton:
Thanks for sharing this. It is brilliant and even human.
The video points out the humanity of the avatars and, in my opinion put the attention on the fact that our avatars are as extensions of our body (using the McLuhan idea). Your avatar is waiting for you to begin to walk, fly or interact. Great¡
I agree with Pierre Levy (1998:24)when he emphasizes the human aspect of these virtual environments saying thatvirtualization is a reinvention, a multiplication, of the human.
Thanks a lot!
Posted by: Gloria Gomez- Diago | July 20, 2009 at 19:05